AOS Cyber Protect is the central cybersecurity proposition. Explore possible service groupings and proposed package concepts, then confirm availability, delivery arrangements, inclusions and exclusions for your environment before a quotation.
Targeted protection for the accounts, devices, networks and information your organisation relies on.
Endpoint and email security
Prevention-first endpoint controls and email protection for Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace.
Potential deliverable: A review of current mail/device controls, recommended configuration or implementation steps and agreed handover.
Suitable for: Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace organisations seeking layered user and device protection.
Technology: Microsoft, Check Point, Sophos, TitanHQ or Barracuda categories may be checked for fit and availability; only Check Point authorised UK partner status is confirmed.
A scoped way to understand current controls, identify priorities and plan proportionate remediation.
Cybersecurity posture review
Start with the free 30-minute review; deeper discovery is separately scoped and is not a penetration test or certification audit.
Potential deliverable: The free 30-minute review provides a Red, Amber or Green score and prioritised fixes; it is not a technical audit or penetration test.
Suitable for: UK businesses and public bodies wanting an initial discussion about security priorities.
Technology: Discussion is based on the existing environment; product decisions are not assumed.
More connected controls for organisations that need stronger visibility, access discipline or management.
Endpoint detection and response
Explore EDR/XDR capabilities and the alert ownership, response boundaries and integrations they require.
Potential deliverable: A scoped EDR/XDR design or implementation plan, with alert ownership and containment permissions documented.
Suitable for: Organisations seeking better endpoint visibility and investigation capability.
Technology: Check Point, Sophos and Microsoft options may be considered subject to fit and licensing; no specific non-Check Point partner status is claimed.
Check Point Managed Prevention and Response is one available portfolio option; AOS service scope, provider arrangements and terms must be confirmed in a proposal.
Potential deliverable: A proposal defining the actual provider, products, monitoring hours, escalation routes, response actions and exclusions before engagement.
Suitable for: Organisations seeking an explicitly managed prevention/response arrangement.
Technology: Check Point publishes Managed Prevention & Response; AOS delivery relationship, precise scope and terms require confirmation.
These are concept outlines only, not confirmed products, priced packages or guaranteed service tiers. Final components, vendors, exclusions, onboarding, support and management arrangements must be agreed in writing after discovery. No security solution can remove all risk.
Proposed
Essential Security
Smaller organisations seeking to strengthen baseline protection.
Gaps across user devices, email, identity, network boundaries and recoverability.
Potential components
•Endpoint protection
•Email security
•Multi-factor authentication
•Firewall protection
•Backup and recovery
Possible technology combination
A starting combination may use existing Microsoft controls with an appropriate Check Point network option, or other technologies in AOS’s current ecosystem where fit and availability are verified. Only Check Point authorised UK partner status is confirmed.
Implementation considerations
Confirm user/device counts, sites, licences, existing providers, onboarding effort, customer-managed responsibilities and any separately scoped support.
Proposed concept only. Components, products, eligibility and delivery are confirmed after discovery; no fixed scope or price is currently published.
Growing organisations seeking better visibility, prevention and recovery planning.
Increasing estate complexity and limited time to prioritise security improvements.
Potential components
•Network and endpoint security
•Identity security
•Threat visibility and response options
•Exposure and vulnerability prioritisation
•Data protection and recovery
Possible technology combination
A possible design may combine Check Point capabilities with existing Microsoft or AWS security controls, and suitable backup/recovery technologies from the current ecosystem, subject to platform, licences and documentation checks.
Implementation considerations
Agree scope across sites, users and cloud accounts; document monitoring provider, hours, escalation and response permissions; confirm migration, testing, onboarding and handover.
Proposed concept only. Any monitoring or response service is subject to named provider, hours, boundaries and written terms.
Larger organisations with complex infrastructure, sites or access requirements.
Broad access, multiple environments and fragmented security responsibilities.
Potential components
•Network segmentation
•Zero Trust access options
•Privileged access considerations
•Cloud security
•Security monitoring integration
•Data protection and governance
Possible technology combination
A possible architecture may include Check Point network or secure access options and Microsoft/AWS controls where these fit the existing environment. Any additional PAM, DLP or monitoring vendor needs independent capability and commercial verification.
Implementation considerations
Requires architecture discovery, identity/network/cloud ownership, compatibility and licence review, change control, data-handling decisions and written agreement on ongoing operational responsibilities.
Proposed concept only. Architecture, vendors, integration, licensing and delivery capacity require technical scoping and written confirmation.
