Skip to content
AOS Technologiies logo
HomeAOS Cyber Protect · flagship
What We Do
Endpoint protectionEmail securityNetwork securityCloud securityIdentity and accessData protectionManaged security servicesThreat monitoring and detectionVulnerability managementIncident preparation and response coordinationCybersecurity assessmentsIT security reviewsCyber risk managementSecurity strategyCompliance supportBackup and recoveryBusiness resilience
ProductsEndpoint and network securityEmail and collaboration securityCloud and SaaS securityIdentity and access securityData protectionMonitoring and threat detectionVendor portfoliosSolutionsCybersecurity insightsSecurity news and updatesBlogs and articlesCybersecurity guidesCase studies and scenariosFrequently asked questionsCompany overviewOur approachTechnology partnersWhy choose AOSContact usCareersCustomer LoginGet Protected

Illustrative product stack

Identity & Privileged Access Security Stack

People, applications, administrators and suppliers need access to business systems. Without consistent authentication and permission ownership, compromised or stale accounts may expose more than intended.

This page shows possible product roles and alternatives, not a fixed bill of materials. Final selection depends on your existing infrastructure, risk profile, budget, licences, technical requirements and compatibility.

Discuss This Solution Request a Technology Consultation

The business problem

Why this security area matters

Identity controls reduce unnecessary access and strengthen authentication. Ordinary user identity management and privileged access management solve related but distinct problems; not every organisation needs a separate PAM platform.

How organisations become exposed

Shared administrator accounts, inactive leaver accounts, broad permissions, weak MFA coverage and unowned service accounts create avoidable risk. Adding multiple identity products without understanding existing subscriptions can create conflicting policies.

Who should consider this stack?

Microsoft 365 or cloud users, hybrid organisations, businesses with third-party access, administrator accounts, mergers, rapid growth or repeated assurance questions about MFA and access reviews.

How to compare options

  • • Compatibility with existing infrastructure and licences.
  • • Security requirements, coverage and integration needs.
  • • Operational overhead, alert ownership and support requirements.
  • • Implementation effort and budget, confirmed in a tailored proposal.

Inside the stack

Possible components and their roles

A candidate configuration for discussion. Core options, alternatives and optional layers are labelled so competing products are not presented as a default bundle.

Layer 01core option

Microsoft

Microsoft Entra ID

Identity and access management

Vendor info reviewed 2026-10-28

Official product information ↗

Role

Potential foundation for authentication, MFA and conditional access in Microsoft environments, subject to licensing.

How it fits & relationship

Can serve everyday employee and application identity needs; confirm current plan and configuration.

Technology ecosystem; no partner authorisation claimed

Product names checked against the vendor's site on 2026-10-28. Availability subject to vendor licensing, region and terms; contact AOS to confirm current options.

Layer 02optional

Check Point

Check Point secure access and remote access VPN

Secure access

Vendor info reviewed 2026-10-28

Official product information ↗

Role

Access control for network and application access where the architecture fits.

How it fits & relationship

Complements identity controls by applying access policies to networks and resources.

Authorised UK Check Point partner

Product names checked against the vendor's site on 2026-10-28. Availability subject to vendor licensing, region and terms; contact AOS to confirm current options.

Layer 03optional

CyberArk

Privileged Access Security

Privileged access management

Vendor info reviewed 2026-10-28

Official product information ↗

Role

Potential separate PAM platform for privileged account controls.

How it fits & relationship

Only adds distinct value where high-risk accounts, sessions or credentials require dedicated controls beyond the identity provider.

Not a confirmed AOS vendor relationship or offering; sourcing and delivery must be verified.

Product names checked against the vendor's site on 2026-10-28. Availability subject to vendor licensing, region and terms; contact AOS to confirm current options.

Layer 04alternative

BeyondTrust

Privileged Access Management

Privileged access management

Vendor info reviewed 2026-10-28

Official product information ↗

Role

Potential PAM alternative for privileged access use cases.

How it fits & relationship

Alternative to other PAM products; do not deploy multiple PAM suites by default.

Not a confirmed AOS vendor relationship or offering; sourcing and delivery must be verified.

Product names checked against the vendor's site on 2026-10-28. Availability subject to vendor licensing, region and terms; contact AOS to confirm current options.

How the stack works together

From visibility to continuous improvement

  1. 01Inventory users, administrators, applications, service accounts and external access.
  2. 02Use the existing identity platform for MFA and access policies where suitable.
  3. 03Separate privileged activity from daily accounts and define approval/expiry.
  4. 04Add a dedicated PAM platform only where the risk and operational need justify it.
  5. 05Review access ownership and exceptions as people and systems change.

Example architecture to assess

For many Microsoft-based environments, begin with existing Microsoft identity capabilities, consistent MFA and least privilege. Consider dedicated PAM as a separately evaluated layer for high-impact administrator accounts, not a default add-on. Check Point secure access may complement network controls.

Alternatives and optional layers

Microsoft Entra is a current ecosystem option. CyberArk, BeyondTrust, Okta and Cisco Duo are not verified AOS partner or delivery offerings in this project; list only as market possibilities after sourcing and capability checks.

How AOS can help

Advice, scope and delivery boundaries

AOS can discuss identity, remote access and account exposure as part of the free 30-minute cybersecurity review, then scope improvements around current identity platforms and secure-access capabilities. Dedicated identity governance or PAM product implementation must be confirmed separately.

Questions & answers

Frequently asked questions

Is MFA enough to secure identities?

No. MFA strengthens authentication but does not replace least privilege, account lifecycle controls, session oversight or access reviews.

Do all organisations need PAM?

Not necessarily. The case depends on administrator risk, account volume, operational constraints and the controls already available in the identity platform.

Can identity security work with existing applications?

Compatibility varies by application and authentication method. Validate each important dependency and plan staged changes.

Related product stacks and services

Zero Trust, SASE & secure access →Data protection & loss prevention →Endpoint protection & EDR/XDR →Technology Partners →

Find the Right Security Stack for Your Business

Every organisation has a different security environment. Talk to AOS Technologiies about your requirements and explore a technology stack designed around your business.

Discuss Your Requirements